Penyederhanaan Struktur Birokrasi: Sebuah Tinjauan Perspektif Teoretis dan Empiris Pada Kebijakan Penghapusan Eselon III dan IV
Keywords:
bureaucratic structure, theoretical perspectives, empirical perspective
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Pelaksanaan grand design reformasi birokrasi, sampai dengan roadmap kedua, memang telah mencapai banyak hal. Namun demikian, tidak tercapainya indikator yang mencerminkan kapabilitas birokrasi, menunjukkan masih ada yang kurang dari pelaksanaan reformasi birokrasi di Indonesia. Masih terdapat permasalahan kelembagaan, budaya organisasi, profesionalisme SDM aparatur, tata laksana dan etika dalam pelayanan publik. Kajian ini sebagai upaya mengisi gap dalam literatur reformasi sektor publik di Indonesia, dari perspektif teoretis dan empiris, mengenai perlunya penyederhanaan struktur birokrasi yang dibahas melalui metode studi pustaka. Penyederhanaan struktur birokrasi, secara teroretis, diperlukan karena karakteristik yang terlalu birokratis sudah tidak sejalan dengan paradigma administrasi publik dan periode reformasi tata kelola sektor publik terkini, di samping karena desentralisasi. Secara empiris, penyederhanaan struktur birokrasi diperlukan karena menghambat peningkatan profesionalitas aparatur yang terlihat dari gejala bluffocracy dan consultocracy.
Kata kunci: reformasi birokrasi, desentralisasi, paradigma adminsistrasi publik, profesionalitas aparatur
ABSTRACT
The implementation of the grand design for bureaucratic reform, up to the second roadmap, has indeed achieved many things. However, the failure to achieve indicators that reflect the capabilities of the bureaucracy, shows that there is still something lacking in the implementation of bureaucratic reform in Indonesia. There are still institutional problems, organizational culture, professionalism of human resources, govern ance and ethics in public services. This study is an attempt to fill gaps in the literature on public sector reform in Indonesia, from a theoretical and empirical perspective, regarding the need to simplify the bureaucratic structure discussed through the literature study method. Simplification of the bureaucratic structure, from the theoretical perspectives, is necessary because too bureaucratic characteristics are not in line with the recent paradigm of public administration and the current period of public sector governance reform, in addition to decentralization. Empirically, simplification of the bureaucratic structure is needed because it impedes professionalism of the apparatus indicated by the symptoms of bluffocracy and consultocracy.
Keywords: bureaucratic reformation, decentralization, public administration paradigm apparatus professionalism
References
Alonso, J. M., Clifton, J., & Díaz-Fuentes, D. (2015). Did New Public Management Matter? An empirical analysis of the outsourcing and decentralization effects on public sector size. Public Management Review, 17(5), 643-660. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.822532. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.822532
Angkasah, L., Adolf, H., & Wibowo, G. D. H. (2017). Bureaucratic Reform in the Perspective of State Administration Law. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(5-1), 35-41.
Ball, J., & Greenway, A. (2018). The rise of the bluffocracy: Britain has become hooked on a culture of inexpertise. Retrieved from https://www.spectator.co.uk/2018/08/the-bluffocracy-how-britain-ended-up-being-run-by-eloquent-chancers
Bappenas. (2013). Evaluasi Kebijakan Reformasi Birokrasi. Retrieved from Jakarta: https://www.bappenas.go.id/files/ekps/2013/4.Evaluasi%20Kebijakan%20Reformasi%20Birokrasi.pdf
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2017). BPK Berikan Opini WTP atas LKPP Tahun 2016. Retrieved from https://www.bpk.go.id/news/bpk-berikan-opini-wtp-atas-lkpp-tahun-2016
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2019). BPK Kembali Memberikan Opini WTP atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2018. Retrieved from https://www.bpk.go.id/news/bpk-kembali-memberikan-opini-wtp-atas-laporan-keuangan-pemerintah-pusat-tahun-2018
BKN. (2011). Profil Statistik Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Jakarta Retrieved from http://bkn.go.id/in/profil/unit-kerja/inka/direktorat-pengolahan-data/profil-statistik-ASN/distribusi-ASNberdasarkan-kelompok-jenis-jabatan-dan-jenis-kelamin-1-oktober-2011.html
BKN. (2016). Civil Apparatus Policy Brief: Rasionalisasi Kebutuhan dan Distribusi ASN Nasional. Jakarta Retrieved from https://www.bkn.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Policy-Brief-Distribusi-ASN20-10-2016.pdf
BKN. (2017). Hasil Talent Pool 2017: 4,17 % Pejabat Tinggi Birokrasi Berkompetensi dan Potensi Tinggi. Retrieved from https://www.bkn.go.id/berita/hasil-talent-pool-2017-417-pejabat-tinggi-birokrasi-berkompetensi-dan-potensi-tinggi
BKN. (2018). Civil Apparatus Policy Brief: Dikotomi Sistem Merit dan Politisasi Birokrasi dalam Pengangkatan Jabatan ASN. Jakarta Retrieved from https://www.bkn.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/05.Policy-Brief-Mei-2018.pdf
BKN. (2019). Buku Statistik Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Jakarta Retrieved from https://www.bkn.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/buku-statistik-2.pdf
Byrkjeflot, H., du Gay, P., & Greve, C. (2018). What is the ‘Neo-Weberian State’as a Regime of Public Administration? In The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe (pp. 991-1009): Springer.
Clegg, S. (1990). Modern organizations: Organization studies in the postmodern world: Sage.
Diefenbach, T., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2011). Formal and Informal Hierarchy in Different Types of Organization. Organization Studies, 32(11), 1515-1537. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0170840611421254. doi:10.1177/0170840611421254
Downs, A. (1964). Inside Bureaucracy. RAND Corporation paper series, 2963. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2008/P2963.pdf.
Du Gay, P. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy: Weber-organization-ethics: Sage.
Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public money & management, 14(3), 9-16.
Gaus, N., Sultan, S., & Basri, M. (2017). State Bureaucracy in Indonesia and its Reforms: An Overview. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(8), 658-669. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1186179. doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1186179
Greve, C., Ejersbo, N., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2020). Unpacking Nordic Administrative Reforms: Agile and Adaptive Governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(8), 697-710. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1645688. doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1645688
Gualmini, E. (2008). Restructuring Weberian Bureaucracy: Comparing Managerial Reforms in Europe and the United States. Public Administration, 86(1), 75-94. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00691.x. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00691.x
Harun, H., Mir, M., Carter, D., & An, Y. (2019). Examining the unintended outcomes of NPM reforms in Indonesia. Public money & management, 39(2), 86-94.
Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less?: Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central Government: OUP Oxford.
Hood, C., & Jackson, M. W. (1991). Administrative argument: Dartmouth Publishing Group.
Jatmiko Wahyu Prabowo, T., Leung, P., & Guthrie, J. (2017). Reforms in public sector accounting and budgeting in Indonesia (2003-2015): confusions in implementation. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 29(1), 104-137. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-29-01-2017-B005. doi:10.1108/JPBAFM-29-01-2017-B005
Kasim, A. (2013). Bureaucratic Reform and Dynamic Goernance for Combating Corruption: The Challenge for Indonesia. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 20(1).
Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2020). The Worldwide Governance Indicators. Retrieved from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 29 Tahun 2012 tentang Perubahan Rencana Kerja Strategis Tahun 2010 - 2014, (2012a).
Surat Edaran Menteri PAN dan RB Nomor 16 Tahun 2012 tentang Tata Cara Pengisian Jabatan Struktural yang Lowong Secara Terbuka di Lingkungan Instansi Pemerintah, (2012b).
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 13 Tahun 2014 tentang Tata Cara Pengisian Jabatan Pimpinan Tinggi Secara Terbuka di Lingkungan Instansi Pemerintah, (2014).
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 38 Tahun 2017 tentang Standar Kompetensi Jabatan Aparatur Sipil Negara, (2017).
KemenPAN-RB. (2018). Sejumlah Capaian Reformasi Birokrasi 2014-2018. Retrieved from https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/sejumlah-capaian-reformasi-birokrasi-2014-2018
KemenPAN-RB. (2019). Rencana Strategis Kementerian PAN-RB. Jakarta Retrieved from https://kita.menpan.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Konsep-Renstra-Kemenpan-2020-2024.pdf
Komarudin. (2012). Penataan Struktur Birokrasi: Kementerian dan Lembaga Pemerintah Non Kementerian. Jurnal Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara, II(II), 10-33. Retrieved from https://www.menpan.go.id/site/emagz/jurnal/2012_Jurnal_Tahun_2012.pdf.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2010). Integritas Sektor Publik Indonesia Tahun 2010. Retrieved from Jakarta: https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/component/bdthemes_shortcodes/?view=download&id=e79496b63a78a5c97bfe9f5e078551
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2018). Survei Penilaian Integritas: Laporan Ilmiah Gabungan 2018. Retrieved from Jakarta: https://www.kpk.go.id/images/01/Laporan-Ilmiah-Gabungan-SPI-2018---Indonesia.pdf
Kuhlmann, S., Bogumil, J., & Grohs, S. (2008). Evaluating Administrative Modernization in German Local Governments: Success or Failure of the “New Steering Model”? Public Administration Review, 68(5), 851-863. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00927.x. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00927.x
McCourt, W. (2018). Towards “cognitively complex” problem-solving: Six models of public service reform. Development Policy Review, 36(S2), O748-O768. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/dpr.12306. doi:10.1111/dpr.12306
McLeod, R. H. (2005). The struggle to regain effective government under democracy in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 41(3), 367-386.
Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 20 Tahun 2010 tentang Road Map Reformasi Birokrasi 2010-2014, (2010).
Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 11 Tahun 2015 tentang Road Map Reformasi Birokrasi 2015-2019, (2015).
Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 25 Tahun 2020 tentang Road Map Reformasi Birokrasi 2020-2024, (2020).
Nurprojo, I. S. (2014). Merit System dan Politik Birokrasi di Era Otonomi Daerah. Civil Service Journal, 8(1 Juni).
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Park, S. (2019). Dusk for the pyramid-shaped bureaucracy: examining the shape of the U.S. federal bureaucracy in the twenty first century. Quality & Quantity, 53(3), 1565-1585. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0827-1. doi:10.1007/s11135-018-0827-1
Polidano, C., & Hulme, D. (1999). Public Management Reform in Developing Countries. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 1(1), 121-132. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037800000007. doi:10.1080/14719037800000007
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis—New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State (Third ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Prasojo, E. (2009). Reformasi Kedua: Melanjutkan Estafet Reformasi. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba.
Prasojo, E., & Holidin, D. (2018). Leadership and Public Sector Reform in Indonesia. In E. Berman (Ed.), Leadership and Public Sector Reform in Asia (pp. 53-83). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Pratama, A. B. (2017). Bureaucracy reform deficit in indonesia: a cultural theory perspective. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 7(3), 88-99.
Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 87 Tahun 1999 tentang Rumpun Jabatan Fungsional Pegawai Negeri Sipil, (1999).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara, (2003).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2007 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Nasional Tahun 2005-2025 (2007).
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010–2025, (2010).
Penjelasan atas Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, (2014).
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2017 tentang Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil, (2017).
Rewansyah, A. (2011). Revitalisasi Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil dalam Implementasi Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara, I(I), 109-138. Retrieved from https://www.menpan.go.id/site/emagz/jurnal/2011_Jurnal_Tahun_2011.pdf.
Saint-Martin, D. (1998). Management consultants, the state, and the politics of administrative reform in Britain and Canada. Administration & Society, 30(5), 533-568.
Schiavo-Campo, S. (1996). Reforming the civil service. Finance and Development-English Edition, 33(3), 10-13.
Seddon, J., & De Tommaso, G. (1999). Civil service reform and decentralization. Decentralization Briefing Notes. World Bank Institute Working Papers. Washington, DC: Banque mondiale.
Suleiman, E. N. (2013). Dismantling democratic states: Princeton University Press.
Sutiyono, W., Pramusinto, A., & Prasojo, E. (2018). Introduction to the mini special issue: understanding governance in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 39(6), 581-588. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1530416. doi:10.1080/01442872.2018.1530416
The World Bank. (2009). Doing Business 2010: Reforming through difficult times. Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://www.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Annual-Reports/English/DB10-FullReport.pdf
The World Bank. (2020). Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/32436/9781464814402.pdf
Transparency International. (2010). Corruption Perceptions Index 2010. Retrieved from Berlin: http://files.transparency.org/content/download/132/531/2010_CPI_EN.pdf
Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2019. Retrieved from Berlin: https://files.transparency.org/content/download/2428/14734/file/2019_CPI_Report_EN.pdf
Turner, M. (2013). Summary Report of the Public Sector Governance Reform Evaluation. In: London: Oxford Policy Management Ltd (OPM).
Turner, M., Imbaruddin, A., & Sutiyono, W. (2009). Human Resource Management: The Forgotten Dimension of Decentralisation in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 45(2), 231-249. doi:10.1080/00074910903040336
Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2019). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 1-19. doi:10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301
Ugyel, L. (2014). Explaining Hybridity in Public Administration: An Empirical Case of Bhutan's Civil Service. Public Administration and Development, 34(2), 109-122. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pad.1685. doi:10.1002/pad.1685
World Economic Forum. (2010). The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011. Retrieved from Geneva, Switzerland: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2010-11.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018. Retrieved from Geneva, Switzerland: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2017-2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2017%E2%80%932018.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. Retrieved from Geneva, Switzerland: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf
Ylönen, M., & Kuusela, H. (2019). Consultocracy and its discontents: A critical typology and a call for a research agenda. Governance, 32(2), 241-258.
Angkasah, L., Adolf, H., & Wibowo, G. D. H. (2017). Bureaucratic Reform in the Perspective of State Administration Law. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 8(5-1), 35-41.
Ball, J., & Greenway, A. (2018). The rise of the bluffocracy: Britain has become hooked on a culture of inexpertise. Retrieved from https://www.spectator.co.uk/2018/08/the-bluffocracy-how-britain-ended-up-being-run-by-eloquent-chancers
Bappenas. (2013). Evaluasi Kebijakan Reformasi Birokrasi. Retrieved from Jakarta: https://www.bappenas.go.id/files/ekps/2013/4.Evaluasi%20Kebijakan%20Reformasi%20Birokrasi.pdf
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2017). BPK Berikan Opini WTP atas LKPP Tahun 2016. Retrieved from https://www.bpk.go.id/news/bpk-berikan-opini-wtp-atas-lkpp-tahun-2016
Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia. (2019). BPK Kembali Memberikan Opini WTP atas Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat Tahun 2018. Retrieved from https://www.bpk.go.id/news/bpk-kembali-memberikan-opini-wtp-atas-laporan-keuangan-pemerintah-pusat-tahun-2018
BKN. (2011). Profil Statistik Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Jakarta Retrieved from http://bkn.go.id/in/profil/unit-kerja/inka/direktorat-pengolahan-data/profil-statistik-ASN/distribusi-ASNberdasarkan-kelompok-jenis-jabatan-dan-jenis-kelamin-1-oktober-2011.html
BKN. (2016). Civil Apparatus Policy Brief: Rasionalisasi Kebutuhan dan Distribusi ASN Nasional. Jakarta Retrieved from https://www.bkn.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Policy-Brief-Distribusi-ASN20-10-2016.pdf
BKN. (2017). Hasil Talent Pool 2017: 4,17 % Pejabat Tinggi Birokrasi Berkompetensi dan Potensi Tinggi. Retrieved from https://www.bkn.go.id/berita/hasil-talent-pool-2017-417-pejabat-tinggi-birokrasi-berkompetensi-dan-potensi-tinggi
BKN. (2018). Civil Apparatus Policy Brief: Dikotomi Sistem Merit dan Politisasi Birokrasi dalam Pengangkatan Jabatan ASN. Jakarta Retrieved from https://www.bkn.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/05.Policy-Brief-Mei-2018.pdf
BKN. (2019). Buku Statistik Pegawai Negeri Sipil. Jakarta Retrieved from https://www.bkn.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/buku-statistik-2.pdf
Byrkjeflot, H., du Gay, P., & Greve, C. (2018). What is the ‘Neo-Weberian State’as a Regime of Public Administration? In The Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe (pp. 991-1009): Springer.
Clegg, S. (1990). Modern organizations: Organization studies in the postmodern world: Sage.
Diefenbach, T., & Sillince, J. A. A. (2011). Formal and Informal Hierarchy in Different Types of Organization. Organization Studies, 32(11), 1515-1537. Retrieved from https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0170840611421254. doi:10.1177/0170840611421254
Downs, A. (1964). Inside Bureaucracy. RAND Corporation paper series, 2963. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/papers/2008/P2963.pdf.
Du Gay, P. (2000). In praise of bureaucracy: Weber-organization-ethics: Sage.
Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public money & management, 14(3), 9-16.
Gaus, N., Sultan, S., & Basri, M. (2017). State Bureaucracy in Indonesia and its Reforms: An Overview. International Journal of Public Administration, 40(8), 658-669. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1186179. doi:10.1080/01900692.2016.1186179
Greve, C., Ejersbo, N., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2020). Unpacking Nordic Administrative Reforms: Agile and Adaptive Governments. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(8), 697-710. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1645688. doi:10.1080/01900692.2019.1645688
Gualmini, E. (2008). Restructuring Weberian Bureaucracy: Comparing Managerial Reforms in Europe and the United States. Public Administration, 86(1), 75-94. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00691.x. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00691.x
Harun, H., Mir, M., Carter, D., & An, Y. (2019). Examining the unintended outcomes of NPM reforms in Indonesia. Public money & management, 39(2), 86-94.
Hood, C., & Dixon, R. (2015). A government that worked better and cost less?: Evaluating three decades of reform and change in UK central Government: OUP Oxford.
Hood, C., & Jackson, M. W. (1991). Administrative argument: Dartmouth Publishing Group.
Jatmiko Wahyu Prabowo, T., Leung, P., & Guthrie, J. (2017). Reforms in public sector accounting and budgeting in Indonesia (2003-2015): confusions in implementation. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 29(1), 104-137. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-29-01-2017-B005. doi:10.1108/JPBAFM-29-01-2017-B005
Kasim, A. (2013). Bureaucratic Reform and Dynamic Goernance for Combating Corruption: The Challenge for Indonesia. Bisnis & Birokrasi Journal, 20(1).
Kaufmann, D., & Kraay, A. (2020). The Worldwide Governance Indicators. Retrieved from http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 29 Tahun 2012 tentang Perubahan Rencana Kerja Strategis Tahun 2010 - 2014, (2012a).
Surat Edaran Menteri PAN dan RB Nomor 16 Tahun 2012 tentang Tata Cara Pengisian Jabatan Struktural yang Lowong Secara Terbuka di Lingkungan Instansi Pemerintah, (2012b).
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 13 Tahun 2014 tentang Tata Cara Pengisian Jabatan Pimpinan Tinggi Secara Terbuka di Lingkungan Instansi Pemerintah, (2014).
Peraturan Menteri Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 38 Tahun 2017 tentang Standar Kompetensi Jabatan Aparatur Sipil Negara, (2017).
KemenPAN-RB. (2018). Sejumlah Capaian Reformasi Birokrasi 2014-2018. Retrieved from https://www.menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/sejumlah-capaian-reformasi-birokrasi-2014-2018
KemenPAN-RB. (2019). Rencana Strategis Kementerian PAN-RB. Jakarta Retrieved from https://kita.menpan.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/Konsep-Renstra-Kemenpan-2020-2024.pdf
Komarudin. (2012). Penataan Struktur Birokrasi: Kementerian dan Lembaga Pemerintah Non Kementerian. Jurnal Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara, II(II), 10-33. Retrieved from https://www.menpan.go.id/site/emagz/jurnal/2012_Jurnal_Tahun_2012.pdf.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2010). Integritas Sektor Publik Indonesia Tahun 2010. Retrieved from Jakarta: https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/component/bdthemes_shortcodes/?view=download&id=e79496b63a78a5c97bfe9f5e078551
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. (2018). Survei Penilaian Integritas: Laporan Ilmiah Gabungan 2018. Retrieved from Jakarta: https://www.kpk.go.id/images/01/Laporan-Ilmiah-Gabungan-SPI-2018---Indonesia.pdf
Kuhlmann, S., Bogumil, J., & Grohs, S. (2008). Evaluating Administrative Modernization in German Local Governments: Success or Failure of the “New Steering Model”? Public Administration Review, 68(5), 851-863. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00927.x. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00927.x
McCourt, W. (2018). Towards “cognitively complex” problem-solving: Six models of public service reform. Development Policy Review, 36(S2), O748-O768. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/dpr.12306. doi:10.1111/dpr.12306
McLeod, R. H. (2005). The struggle to regain effective government under democracy in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 41(3), 367-386.
Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 20 Tahun 2010 tentang Road Map Reformasi Birokrasi 2010-2014, (2010).
Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 11 Tahun 2015 tentang Road Map Reformasi Birokrasi 2015-2019, (2015).
Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Nomor 25 Tahun 2020 tentang Road Map Reformasi Birokrasi 2020-2024, (2020).
Nurprojo, I. S. (2014). Merit System dan Politik Birokrasi di Era Otonomi Daerah. Civil Service Journal, 8(1 Juni).
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Park, S. (2019). Dusk for the pyramid-shaped bureaucracy: examining the shape of the U.S. federal bureaucracy in the twenty first century. Quality & Quantity, 53(3), 1565-1585. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0827-1. doi:10.1007/s11135-018-0827-1
Polidano, C., & Hulme, D. (1999). Public Management Reform in Developing Countries. Public Management: An International Journal of Research and Theory, 1(1), 121-132. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037800000007. doi:10.1080/14719037800000007
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis—New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State (Third ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Prasojo, E. (2009). Reformasi Kedua: Melanjutkan Estafet Reformasi. Jakarta: Penerbit Salemba.
Prasojo, E., & Holidin, D. (2018). Leadership and Public Sector Reform in Indonesia. In E. Berman (Ed.), Leadership and Public Sector Reform in Asia (pp. 53-83). Bingley: Emerald Publishing Limited.
Pratama, A. B. (2017). Bureaucracy reform deficit in indonesia: a cultural theory perspective. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 7(3), 88-99.
Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 87 Tahun 1999 tentang Rumpun Jabatan Fungsional Pegawai Negeri Sipil, (1999).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara, (2003).
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2007 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Nasional Tahun 2005-2025 (2007).
Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010–2025, (2010).
Penjelasan atas Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, (2014).
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2017 tentang Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil, (2017).
Rewansyah, A. (2011). Revitalisasi Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil dalam Implementasi Reformasi Birokrasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara, I(I), 109-138. Retrieved from https://www.menpan.go.id/site/emagz/jurnal/2011_Jurnal_Tahun_2011.pdf.
Saint-Martin, D. (1998). Management consultants, the state, and the politics of administrative reform in Britain and Canada. Administration & Society, 30(5), 533-568.
Schiavo-Campo, S. (1996). Reforming the civil service. Finance and Development-English Edition, 33(3), 10-13.
Seddon, J., & De Tommaso, G. (1999). Civil service reform and decentralization. Decentralization Briefing Notes. World Bank Institute Working Papers. Washington, DC: Banque mondiale.
Suleiman, E. N. (2013). Dismantling democratic states: Princeton University Press.
Sutiyono, W., Pramusinto, A., & Prasojo, E. (2018). Introduction to the mini special issue: understanding governance in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 39(6), 581-588. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2018.1530416. doi:10.1080/01442872.2018.1530416
The World Bank. (2009). Doing Business 2010: Reforming through difficult times. Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://www.doingbusiness.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Annual-Reports/English/DB10-FullReport.pdf
The World Bank. (2020). Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. Retrieved from Washington, DC: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/32436/9781464814402.pdf
Transparency International. (2010). Corruption Perceptions Index 2010. Retrieved from Berlin: http://files.transparency.org/content/download/132/531/2010_CPI_EN.pdf
Transparency International. (2020). Corruption Perceptions Index 2019. Retrieved from Berlin: https://files.transparency.org/content/download/2428/14734/file/2019_CPI_Report_EN.pdf
Turner, M. (2013). Summary Report of the Public Sector Governance Reform Evaluation. In: London: Oxford Policy Management Ltd (OPM).
Turner, M., Imbaruddin, A., & Sutiyono, W. (2009). Human Resource Management: The Forgotten Dimension of Decentralisation in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 45(2), 231-249. doi:10.1080/00074910903040336
Turner, M., Prasojo, E., & Sumarwono, R. (2019). The challenge of reforming big bureaucracy in Indonesia. Policy Studies, 1-19. doi:10.1080/01442872.2019.1708301
Ugyel, L. (2014). Explaining Hybridity in Public Administration: An Empirical Case of Bhutan's Civil Service. Public Administration and Development, 34(2), 109-122. Retrieved from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/pad.1685. doi:10.1002/pad.1685
World Economic Forum. (2010). The Global Competitiveness Report 2010-2011. Retrieved from Geneva, Switzerland: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalCompetitivenessReport_2010-11.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2017). The Global Competitiveness Report 2017-2018. Retrieved from Geneva, Switzerland: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GCR2017-2018/05FullReport/TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2017%E2%80%932018.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019. Retrieved from Geneva, Switzerland: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_TheGlobalCompetitivenessReport2019.pdf
Ylönen, M., & Kuusela, H. (2019). Consultocracy and its discontents: A critical typology and a call for a research agenda. Governance, 32(2), 241-258.
Published
2020-06-30
How to Cite
Nurhestitunggal, M., & Muhlisin, M. (2020). Penyederhanaan Struktur Birokrasi: Sebuah Tinjauan Perspektif Teoretis dan Empiris Pada Kebijakan Penghapusan Eselon III dan IV. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah, 4(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37950/jkpd.v4i1.100
Section
Articles
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.png)
