KAPITAL SOSIAL DALAM PEMBANGUNAN DESA: KRITIK TERHADAP PROGRAM TRADE AND DISTRIBUTION CENTER (BUMDES) DI WILAYAH LOMBOK BARAT-PROVINSI NTB

Syaiful Anam; Alfian Hdayat; Zulkarnain Zulkarnain

doi:10.56945/jkpd.v7i1.227

Syaiful Anam Universitas Mtaram
Alfian Hdayat Universitas Mataram
Zulkarnain Zulkarnain Universitas Mataram

DOI: https://doi.org/10.56945/jkpd.v7i1.227

Keywords: Village developmnet, social capital, NTB gemilang, BUMDes, Trade and Distribution Center

Abstract

Development agendas related to improving welfare in developing countries often face failure. In post-authoritarian Indonesia, the development and policy model patterns are still very elite, centralistic, and clientelist. It even often negates the value of local wisdom as one of the failure’s root causes. This study examines how development programs integrate noble values or social capital as the Development Engine. In the context of village development in NTB, to achieve the vision contained in Governor’s NTB Gemilang Program, the village (Trade and Distribution Center) TDC program is designed, namely the distribution program and Trade Center in the village through the Village-owned Enterprise (BUMDes-Badan Usaha Milik Desa) business scheme. This scheme aims to modernize and digitize the village by fulfilling the basic needs of the village population. This program also is expected to contribute to the village’s domestic income (PADes). However, in the development of BUMDes in Indonesia, this policy model is often distorted for political and development interests that are partial and short-term. This study examines and critically studies the loss of social capital in implementing the TDC program. Modernization and digitalization in the village development agenda, in general, have a good purpose. But it will also damage the values of village Wisdom when development removes an important aspect of existing social capital. Through an exploratory qualitative approach, this study focuses on the pilot project TDC in West Lombok NTB, which implicitly found that social capital is not reproduced in the development agenda because it is deemed as entirely political and elite both in the making and implementation.

References

Abidin, M. Z. (2015). Tinjauan atas pelaksanaan keuangan desa dalam mendukung kebijakan dana desa. Jurnal Ekonomi & Kebijakan Publik, 6(1).

Adawiyah, R. (2018). Strategi Pengembangan Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes) Berbasis Aspek Modal Sosial. Kebijakan Dan Manajemen Publik, 6(3), 1–15.

Amin, K. (2017). Elit dan Kekuasaan pada Masyarakat Desa (Studi Relasi Antara Pemerintah dan Masyarakat di Desa Rias Kecamatan Toboali Kabupaten Bangka Selatan Provinsi Kep. Bangka Belitung. Jurnal Sosiologi USK (Media Pemikiran & Aplikasi, 11(2), 167–187.

Andari, R. N. (2021). Resensi: SDGs Desa, Percepatan Pencapaian Tujuan Pembangunan Nasional Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Wacana Kinerja: Kajian Praktis-Akademis Kinerja dan Administrasi Pelayanan Publik, 24(1), 137. https://doi.org/10.31845/jwk.v24i1.713

Anggraeni, H., & Sugianto, T. (2020). Kapital Sosial Dalam Pembangunan Ekonomi Di Kawasan Terpencil. Jurkami : Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 2(2), 61–68. https://doi.org/10.31932/jpe.v2i2.617

Chambers, R. (1987). Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa , Mulai Dari Belakang. In LP3ES.

Diah, M. P. (2020). Journal of Research, 2(2), 165–173. https://doi.org/10.33005/paj.v2i2.45

Evans, P. (1996). Government action, social capital and development: Reviewing the evidence on synergy. World Development, 24(6), 1119–1132. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00021-6

Fathy, R. (2019). Modal Sosial: Konsep, Inklusivitas dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jurnal Pemikiran Sosiologi, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v6i1.47463

Fitriyani, Y., Nurmalina, R., Pebriana, R., & Suasri, E. (2018). Menggerakkan Ekonomi Desa Melalui Badan Usaha Milik Desa (BUMDes). Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat MEDITEG, 3(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.34128/mediteg.v3i1.35

Fukuyama, F. (2002). Social Capital and Development: The Coming Agenda. SAIS Review. https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2002.0009

Gutama, P. P. B., & Widiyahseno, B. (2020). Inklusi Sosial Dalam Pembangunan Desa. REFORMASI, 10(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.33366/rfr.v10i1.1834

Hall, D. (2004). Smallholders and the spread of capitalism in rural Southeast Asia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 45(3), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2004.00248.x

Haryanto. (2016). Masa Depan Politik Desentralisasi di Indonesia: Sebuah Studi Awal. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 9(2), 111–124.

Hisyam, D. (2015). Desentralisasi, Otonomi Daerah, dan Pembangunan. Efisiensi - Kajian Ilmu Administrasi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/efisiensi.v4i1.3803

Johnson, C. (1999). The Developmental State: Odyssey of a Concept. In: Woo-Cumings, M (Ed), The developmental state . Cornell University Press, New York.

Kafabih, A. (2018). Analisis Peran Modal Sosial Badan Usaha Milik Desa (Bum Desa) terhadap Pengentasan Kemiskinan. OECONOMICUS Journal of Economics, 3(1), 51–70. https://doi.org/10.15642/oje.2018.3.1.51-70

Kesuma, P. T. A., & Saputri, L. L. (2020). Modal Sosial Dalam Pengembangan Badan Usaha Milik Desa Dalam Usaha Jasa Pengelolaan Lingkungan. Indonesian Governance Journal : Kajian Politik-Pemerintahan, 3(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.24905/igj.v3i1.1489

Kimbal, M. (2018). Partisipasi Politik Dalam Proses Pembangunan Desa Di Kecamatan Wori Kabupaten Minahasa Utara. Sosiohumaniora, 20(3), 282–287. https://doi.org/10.24198/sosiohumaniora.v20i3.19018

Lestari, I. (2016). Kerja Sama Pembangunan Korea Selatan di Vietnam dalam Pengembangan Area Pedesaan melalui Model Saemaul Undong. Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional, 18(2), 177–201. https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v18i2.303

Mohapatra, B. N., & Evans, P. (1998). State-Society Synergy: Government and Social Capital in Development. Contemporary Sociology. https://doi.org/10.2307/2655207

Muhammad Saleh. (2021). Dinamika Lembaga Demokrasi Desa Di Indonesia (Sebuah Kajian Pustaka). Journal Ilmiah Rinjani : Media Informasi Ilmiah Universitas Gunung Rinjani, 9(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.53952/jir.v9i2.334

Nain, U. (2019). Pembangunan Desa Dalam Perspektif Sosiohistoris. In F. Muhammad (Ed.), Garis Khatulistiwa. Graha Khatulistiwa.

Nasution, R. D. (2016). Pengaruh Kesenjangan Digital Terhadap Pembangunan Pedesaan (Rural Development). Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi Dan Opini Publik, 20(1 Juni), 31–44.

Peet, R., & Hartwick, E. (2015). Introduction: Growth versus Development. In Theories of Development: Contentions, Arguments, Alternatives. Guilford Press.

Pratikno. (2020). Pengelolaan Hubungan Antar Pusat dan Daerah. Suloh Jurnal Program Studi Magister Hukum.

Prijambodo, R. F. N., & Mahatmaharti, A. K. (2018). Membangun Modal Sosial Pada Masyarakat Di Era Globalisasi. Alpen: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 1(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.24929/alpen.v1i1.4

Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002

Rahayuningsih, Y., Budiarto, S., & Isminingsih, S. (2019). Peran Bumdes Dalam Penguatan Ekonomi Desa Sukaratu Kabupaten Serang, Banten. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.37950/jkpd.v3i2.63

Riwu Kaho, Josef. (1997). Prospek Otonomi Daerah di Negara Republik Indonesia. Identifikasi Beberapa Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penyelenggaraanya, 2.

Saputro, A. (2020). Urban Crisis: Produk Kegagalan Urbanisasi di Indonesia. Jurnal Sosiologi Reflektif, 15(1), 173. https://doi.org/10.14421/jsr.v15i1.2000

Sugianto, S., & Permadhy, Y. T. (2020). Perencanaan Pembangunan Inklusif Melalui Peran Partisipatif Pemerintah Daerah. EcceS (Economics, Social, and Development Studies), 7(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.24252/ecc.v7i1.13565

Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476. https://doi.org/10.5465/257085

Waris, I. (2012). Pergeseran Paradigma Sentralisasi ke Desentralisasi Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance. Jurnal Kebijakan Publik, 3(1), 38–47.