Fenomena Deindustrialisasi di Kota Tangerang dan Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhinya

  • Reza Septian Pradana BPS Kabupaten Aceh Jaya
Keywords: deindustrialization, economy openness, investment, multiple regression, price level

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis fenomena deindustrialisasi di Kota Tangerang dan faktor-faktor yang memengaruhinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi linier berganda. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa adanya fenomena deindustrialisasi di Kota Tangerang yang ditandai dengan penurunan peran sektor industri terhadap perekonomian Kota Tangerang selama periode 2010-2018. Hasil estimasi dengan analisis regresi linier berganda menunjukkan bahwa keterbukaan ekonomi secara signifikan berpengaruh positif terhadap peran sektor industri terhadap perekonomian Kota Tangerang. Sebaliknya, proporsi investasi dan tingkat harga secara signifikan berpengaruh negatif terhadap peran sektor industri terhadap perekonomian Kota Tangerang. Dengan demikian, diperlukan upaya peningkatan keterbukaan ekonomi melalui kegiatan ekspor dan impor, peningkatan investasi non bangunan, dan pengendalian tingkat harga untuk mengatasi fenomena deindustrialisasi di Kota Tangerang.          

Kata kunci: deindustrialisasi, investasi, keterbukaan ekonomi, tingkat harga

 

ABSTRACT

This study aims to analyze phenomenon of deindustrialization in Tangerang City and influencing factors. This study uses multiple regression analysis. The result of analysis shows that phenomenon of deindustrialization is occured in Tangerang City which is showed by decreasing of industry sector’s share to the economy of Tangerang City during period 2010-2018.  The result of estimation by using multiple regression analysis shows that economic openness significantly give positive influence to share of industry sector to the economy of Tangerang City. While, share of investment and price level significantly give negative influence to share of industry sector to the economy of Tangerang City. So, the effort to increase economic openness through export and import activity, increase non-building investment, and control price level to handle the phenomenon of deindustrialization in Tangerang City.

Keyword: deindustrialization, economic openness, investment, price level

References

Aiginger, K. (2003). De-industrialization and the Lisbon Agenda. Austrian Institute of Economic Research, University of Linz.

Alderson, A. (1999). Explaining Deindustrialization: Globalization, Failure, or Success?. American Sociological Review Vol. 64 (5): 701-721.

Dasgupta S, Singh A. (2006). Manufacturing, Services and Premature Deindustrialization in Developing Countries: A Kaldorian Analysis. Research Paper United Nation University No. 2006/49: 1-18.

Dewi, D.A. (2010). Deindustrialisasi di Indonesia 1983-2008: Analisis Dengan Pendekatan Kaldorian. Bogor: IPB.

Gujarati, Damodar N. (2004). Basic Econometrics: Forth Edition. Mc. Graw Hill Companies.

Jakti, D.K., Suwarman, W. (2005). Faktor-Faktor yang Mendorong Terjadinya Proses Deindustrialisasi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Jalalian H, Weiss J. (2000). De-industrialisation in Sub-Saharan: Myth or Crysis?. Journal of American Economies Volume 9 Number 1: 24-43.

Kustanto H, et al. (2012). Reindustrialisasi dan Dampaknya Terhadap Ekonomi Makro Serta Kinerja Sektor Industri di Indonesia. Jurnal Riset Industri Vol. VI No.1: 97-115.

Metinara, Susi. (2011). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Deindustrialisasi Di Indonesia Tahun 2000-2009. Bogor : IPB

Mickiewicz, T. dan Zalewska, A. (2002). Deindustrialisation, Lesson from the Structural Outcomes of Post-Communist Transition. William Davidson Institute Working paper No. 463, Januari 2002.

Palma, J.G. (2007). Four Sources of “Deindustrialization” and A New Concept of the “Dutch Disease”.

Pratama, J. (2012). Fenomena Deindustrialisasi di Provinsi Jawa Timur Tahun 1990-2010 Berdasarkan Model Vector Error Correction Mechanism. Jakarta: STIS.

Putra, R.T. (2012). Fenomena Deindustrialisasi di Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara Tahun 1990-2010 Berdasarkan Metode Error Correction Model (ECM). Jakarta: STIS.

Rowthorn R. (1992). Productivity and American Leadership – A Review. Review of Income and Wealth Vol. 38, No. 4: 47-96.

Rowthorn, R., Wells, J.R. (1987). Deindustrialisation and Foreign Trade. Cambridge University Press.

Rowthorn, R., Ramaswamy, R. (1997). Deindustrialisation: Causes and Implications. IMF Working Paper WP/97/42. International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C.

Singh A. (1977). UK Industry and The World Economy: A Case of Deindustrialization?. Cambridge Journal of Economics Volume 1 Number 2: 113-136.

Watts, M., Valadkani, A. (2001). The Impact of Deindustrialization on Employment Outcomes in Australia, Japan and the USA. Centre of Full Employment and Equity, The University of Newcastle, Australia.
Published
2020-06-30
How to Cite
Pradana, R. (2020). Fenomena Deindustrialisasi di Kota Tangerang dan Faktor-Faktor yang Memengaruhinya. Jurnal Kebijakan Pembangunan Daerah, 4(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37950/jkpd.v4i1.93
Section
Articles